论文部分内容阅读
【目的】比较超声造影与普通超声在宫颈癌术前诊断和分期中的诊断价值。【方法】回顾性分析经病理检查确诊的宫颈癌患者50例，比较超声造影与普通超声的诊断结果。【结果】超声造影检出率84．0％（42/50）显著高于普通超声检出率为50．0％（25/25），其有统计学意义（P ＜0．05），其中Ⅰ、Ⅱ期检出率比较有统计学意义（P＜0．05），而Ⅲ期、Ⅳ期比较无统计学差异（P＞0．05）；超声造影检测宫颈癌病灶大小及浸润范围明显大于普通超声检测，其差异有统计学意义（P＜0．05）。【结论】超声造影可提高宫颈癌临床诊断率，在宫颈癌诊断及临床分期中比普通超声更具有优势，值得临床推广应用。“,”[Obj ective]To compare the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs.conventional ultrasound in preoperative diagnosis and clinical stage of cervical cancer.[Methods]Totally 50 patients with cervical cancer con-firmed by pathology were analyzed retrospectively.The diagnostic results of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and con-ventional ultrasound were analyzed and compared.[Results]The detection rate of contrast-enhanced ultrasound was 84.0% which was markedly higher than that of conventional ultrasound(50.0%),and there was significant difference(P<0.05).There was significant difference in the detection rate between grade Ⅰ and grade Ⅱ cervi-cal cancer(P0.05).The le-sion size and invasive range of cervical cancer measured by contrast-enhanced ultrasound was obviously larger than those measured by conventional ultrasound,and there was significant difference(P <0.05).[Conclusion]Con-trast-enhanced ultrasound can improve clinical diagnostic rate of cervical cancer,and is superior to conventional ul-trasound in preoperative diagnosis and clinical stage of cervical cancer,so it is worthy of clinical promotion.