论文部分内容阅读
刑事技术鉴定结论作为一种刑事诉讼证据,是刑事技术人员在应用现代科学技术成果,通过收集、获取、检验、鉴定犯罪嫌疑人在犯罪过程中形成的各种痕迹、物品、文书,为刑事案件的侦查破案、检察起诉、法庭审判提供的一种科学的司法证明。鉴定的结论有助于查明案件事实真相、确定案件性质,有助于证据间的相互印证及补充。刑事技术鉴定结论作为刑事诉讼证据的主要形式之一,当然必须符合关于证据合法性的相关要求才能保证其具备法律效力。然而在司法实践中,刑事技术鉴定因其专业性较强,并由有关司法机关做出,往往会被忽视其合法性问题,并且在实际工作中,由于受诸多客观条件的制约及操作人员的主观影响,鉴定结论具有的法律效力的正确性和权威性也会受到制约。其问题的主要症结在于:
As a kind of evidence of criminal procedure, the conclusion of criminal technology appraisal is the result of applying modern science and technology achievements by criminal technicians, collecting, obtaining, testing and identifying various traces, articles and instruments formed by criminal suspects during the criminal process, Investigation and prosecution, prosecutorial prosecution, court trial provides a scientific proof of justice. The conclusion of the appraisal helps to find out the truth of the case, determine the nature of the case, and help to confirm and supplement the evidence. As one of the main forms of evidence in criminal proceedings, the conclusion of criminal technology appraisal must of course be subject to the relevant requirements on the legitimacy of evidence in order to ensure its legal effect. However, in judicial practice, because of its specialization and its making by the relevant judicial organs, criminal technical appraisals tend to be overlooked in its legitimacy. In practical work, due to many objective conditions and the limitations of the operators The subjective influence and the validity and authority of the legal validity of the appraisal conclusion will also be restricted. The main crux of the problem is: