论文部分内容阅读
关于侦查思维特征问题的探究,目前国内学者有许多不同观点。而当学者们提出某一观点的时候,往往又是在批评或者否定其他观点的情况下提出来的。这就走入一个误区,即想用若干个思维特征来规范侦查思维的特征。这不符合唯物辩证法关于事物共性与个性、相对性与绝对性关系的原理。侦查思维特征属于思维的个性特征,而个性特征都是事物的相对特征(即具有相对性),它没有一种绝对的、固定不变的定律或模式。因此,当人们在探讨侦查思维特征的问题时,不应当寻求一种标准化的、统一的模式,而应当允许有各种不同的说法或观点。
At present, there are many different opinions about the question of the characteristics of investigative thinking in our country. When scholars put forward a certain point of view, they often come up with criticisms or denials of other points of view. This goes into a misunderstanding, that is, want to use a number of thinking features to regulate the characteristics of reconnaissance thinking. This is inconsistent with the principle of materialist dialectics on the relationship between commonality and individuality, relativity and absoluteness. Reconnaissance thinking characteristics belong to the personality characteristics of thinking, and personality characteristics are the relative characteristics of things (that is, relative), it does not have an absolute, fixed law or pattern. Therefore, people should not seek a standardized and unified model when exploring the issue of detecting the characteristics of thinking, but should allow for a variety of different opinions or opinions.