论文部分内容阅读
章太炎的“学隐”思想包括“逼”、“隐”、“反”三个密切相关而又各不相同的层面 (因“隐”的一面更具整体意义 ,故本文将它概括为“学隐说”或“学隐”思想 )。历史文化中心论和“严种族之别”的民族主义是其本质特征 ,对乾嘉考据学 的形成及清代汉学家精神风貌的独到洞察和阐释 ,则构成了其核心内容。从渊源来看 ,它是江浙特有的人文地缘和族类意识的直接产物 ,它基本真实地揭示了民族主义的高涨是乾嘉考据学得以形成的枢纽或关键这一内在联系。学者们对乾嘉考据学成因的解说纷争已久 ,因不为学界见重而几至湮没的“学隐”思想 ,或许能最终弥缝各种说法 ,并得出更具说服力的结论。
Zhang Taiyan’s thought of learning implicitness includes three closely related and yet different levels of “force”, “implicit” and “anti”, which are summarized as “learning Hidden ”or“ learn hidden ”thought). The historical and cultural center and the nationalism of “strict race” are the essential features. The unique insights and interpretations of the formation of the Qian-Jia textual research and the spiritual features of the Han scholars in Qing Dynasty constitute the core contents. From the perspective of origin, it is a direct product of the unique geo-cultural and ethnic consciousness of Jiangsu and Zhejiang Provinces. It basically reveals the fact that the rise of nationalism is the key link in the study of Qian and Jia. Scholars have long disputed the explanation of the causes of Qian-Jia textual studies for a long time. Because of the not-learned implicit thought which is rarely seen in academic circles, scholars may finally be able to make various explanations and reach more convincing conclusions.