论文部分内容阅读
目的:研究分析宫颈炎临床使用超声治疗的效果。方法:根据2013年2月至2014年2月该院接收的110例宫颈炎患者来进行研究分析,将这些患者分组为对照组和治疗组,均有55例,治疗组患者使用超声治疗,对照组患者使用微波治疗。对两组的治疗效果和不良反应进行记录比较。结果:经过治疗,治疗组的临床治疗有效率是96.37%,对照组的治疗有效率是70.91%,两组治疗有效率存在统计学差异性(P<0.05);治疗组患者的阴道排液、渗血等不良反应发生率比对照组低(P<0.05)。结论:宫颈炎患者接受超声治疗的有效率比微波治疗高,不良反应率低,临床中可以选择该种治疗方式进行治疗和推广使用。
Objective: To study the effect of clinical treatment of cervicitis with ultrasound. Methods: From February 2013 to February 2014, the hospital received 110 cases of cervicitis patients to carry out research and analysis of these patients were grouped into the control group and the treatment group, 55 cases, the treatment group patients with ultrasound treatment, control Group patients using microwave therapy. The two groups of treatment and adverse reactions were recorded and compared. Results: After treatment, the effective rate of clinical treatment in the treatment group was 96.37%, and that in the control group was 70.91%, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05); the vaginal discharge, Oral bleeding and other adverse reactions than the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Cervicitis patients receive ultrasound treatment efficiency than microwave treatment, the adverse reaction rate is low, the clinical treatment of this treatment can choose to treat and promote the use of.