2004年《最高人民法院关于规范行政案件案由的通知》中列举的26种行政行为是可诉的具体行政行为,不是行政行为的全部,与行政职权也不是一一对应的对等关系,对其实证举要应符合其性质、概念的内在要求,不可生搬硬套。 The 26 administrative acts cited in the “Supreme People’s Court’s Notice on Regulating Administrative Cases in 2004” are specific administrative acts that can be sued. They are not all administrative acts and do not correspond to administrative functions in one-to-one correspondence. In fact, Testification should be consistent with its inherent nature, the concept of the inherent requirements, can not be applied mechanically.