论文部分内容阅读
对于物权请求权存废问题的三种观点,笔者认为保留说坚持的优先性、过错、时效等理由不足以支持其留存,竞合说则会对法律适用造成难题,应采用侵权责任代替说,以建立一个相对统一的大请求权体系。进一步而言,请求权只是权利的权能,并非某项权利的上位或下位概念,也并非独立的民事权利。应区分权利和权能这两个概念,并坚持请求权能与支配权能二分的权能理论,以此构建相对科学、清晰的民法框架。
As to the three kinds of viewpoints about the excuse of claim of real right, the author thinks that the precondition, fault, limitation and so on of persistence are not enough to support its retention, and competing will cause problems to the application of law, instead of using the tort liability , In order to establish a relatively unified system of large claims. Further, the right of claim is only the power of rights, not the concept of superior or subordinate of a right, nor is it an independent civil right. We should distinguish the two concepts of rights and powers and insist on the theory of power that requests the dichotomy between power and power to construct a relatively scientific and clear civil law framework.