文艺复兴时期,源于经典罗马法以及本土化的罗马法的俄罗斯法律制度,其立法构造中之民事法律关系中私法概念愈加突出。这是可以理解的,因为罗马法学的法律规则因其通用性而在各个时代的民法典中复现。事实上这雄辩地证明了罗马法贯穿历史的生命力,更为重要的则是俄罗斯立法者对罗马私法的重视。对古罗马时已深入探究过的,民法独立保护(самостоятелънойэащиты)中有重要意义的占有制度问题的研究,对于现代物权法具有不可替代的实际意义。对占有本质的深入研究,应不失(其作为)所有权的实质特点,并在物权理论的整体上(对其)进行解释。尽管俄罗斯立法中废除了一些规范和制度(特别是废除了占有人的独立保护),占有权和 Renaissance, from the Roman law and the localization of the Roman law of the Russian legal system, the legal structure of the civil legal relations in the concept of private law has become increasingly prominent. This is understandable because the legal rules of Roman jurisprudence are reproduced in the civil codes of every age for their versatility. In fact, this eloquently proves that the Roman law runs through the vitality of history, and more importantly, the Russian legislator’s emphasis on Roman private law. Studying the important possession system in the independent protection of civil law (самостоятелънойэащиты), which has been thoroughly explored in ancient Rome, has irreplaceable practical significance for the modern law of property. In-depth study on the essence of possession should take as its essence the essence of ownership, and explain it (in its entirety) to the theory of real rights. Although some norms and systems have been abolished in Russian legislation (in particular, the independent protection of owners has been abolished), tenure and