论文部分内容阅读
商业秘密侵权案件中举证责任的分配在理论界和实务界存在很大的差异,“谁主张,谁举证”、举证责任倒置以及“接触加相似”原则等是在近些年来认定商业秘密侵权主要的三种分配方法,“谁主张、谁举证”和举证责任倒置这两种分配方法亦有不少的支持者,但在诸多的案件审理当中,法院最普遍的做法是采用“接触+相似”的原则,进行审理和认定,原告除了需要举证证明被告使用的信息与原告商业秘密具有相同性外,再举证证明被告存在获取商业秘密的条件,此时就完成了初步的举证义务,举证责任发生转移,被告应就其所使用信息来源的合法性进行证明,否则其就要承担侵权的不利后果。
The distribution of the burden of proof in cases of trade secret infringement is very different in the theoretical circles and the practical circles. In recent years, “who advocates and who evidences”, the inversion of the burden of proof and the principle of “contact and similarity” There are also many supporters for the three major distribution methods of commercial secret infringement, “who advocates who evidences”, and the burden of proof inversion. However, in many cases, the most common practice in courts is Adopt the principle of “contact + similarity” for trial and determination. In addition to the fact that the plaintiff needs evidence to prove that the defendant uses the same information as the commercial secrets of the plaintiff, the plaintiff proves that the defendant has the condition to acquire the trade secret, and at this time, The initial burden of proof, the transfer of burden of proof, the defendant should verify the legitimacy of the sources of information they use, or they will bear the adverse consequences of infringement.