论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨慢性盆腔炎的诊治措施及临床效果。方法:将2007年1月～于2011年收治的慢性盆腔炎患者80例随机分为观察组40例(腹腔灌注治疗)和对照组40例(单纯口服抗生素治疗),对两组的治疗效果进行对比。结果:两组的起效时间相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。观察组的总有效率为87.5%(35/40),对照组的总有效率为62.5%(25/40),两组的总有效相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:准确的诊治措施可以有效的彻底治愈慢性盆腔炎。
Objective: To investigate the diagnosis and treatment of chronic pelvic inflammatory disease and clinical results. Methods: From January 2007 to December 2011, 80 patients with chronic pelvic inflammatory disease were randomly divided into the observation group of 40 cases (peritoneal perfusion therapy) and the control group of 40 cases (oral antibiotics alone), the treatment effect of both groups Compared. Results: There was significant difference in onset time between the two groups (P <0.01). The total effective rate was 87.5% (35/40) in the observation group and 62.5% (25/40) in the control group. The total effective rate in the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.01). Conclusion: Accurate diagnosis and treatment can effectively and completely cure chronic pelvic inflammatory disease.