90年代初 ,阅读教材的研究势头疲惫了 :不少论述 ,名为创新 ,实是沿袭 ;希冀精深 ,但无掘进 ;志于开拓 ,却在课题门口的“一亩三分地”上转悠不出来 ,预期的理论价值始终未能呈现。王松泉著的《阅读教材论》打破了这裹足不前的疲惫之势 ,“那种宏微相照、虚实结合、纵横连贯的? In the early 1990s, the study of reading teaching materials was exhausted: quite a few dissertations, namely innovations, were followed; hoped to be profound but no progress; and to be pioneering, they were wandering about the “three-acre” Expected, the theoretical value has not been expected to show. Wang Songquan’s “Reading Teaching Material Theory” broke the tired momentum that “was not covered up.” The kind of macro and micro photos, the combination of actual situation and vertical and horizontal?