空驶费、防护栏,先后开庭的两起告出租车公司案,“背景”都与政府规定有关。第一案:防护栏拆除之后11月9日,北京市宣武区人民法院59法庭。法官在一一询问:“原告宋立娟来了吗?”“没有。”“原告胡建斌来了吗?”“没有。”“原告徐书英来了吗?”“没有。”原告席上,三原告的代 Empty driving fee, fence, two court cases have told taxi companies, “background” are related to government regulations. The first case: fence removed After November 9, 59 people’s court of Xuanwu District, Beijing court. The judge inquired one by one: “Did the plaintiff Song Lijuan come?” “No.” “Did the plaintiff Hu Jianbin come?” “No.” “Did the plaintiff Xu Shuying come?” “No.” On the plaintiff, on behalf of the three plaintiffs