论文部分内容阅读
当我们没有重视正当程序时,我们呼唤正当程序,把它视为是拯救行政法制时弊的灵丹妙药。但是,当我们引入正当程序时,却发现它在实践中屡屡失灵而形同虚设。人们不禁对程序开始失望。究其原因,在于某些行政机关对程序的垄断。必须打破这种程序垄断,方能实现程序的结果公正。这需要对我国现有程序进行深入的机制再造。首先,为了让信息公开落到实处,必须细化相关规定,分类分级立法设定公开细节,防止公开漏洞;扩大利害相关人的查询能力,包括帮助人数众多的利害相关人建立临时组织,以期实现信息公开的预期效果。其次,赋予程序参与相对人独立决定权,确保程序参与相对人独立完成一个或者多个程序环节,从而,摆脱程序主持人对程序的垄断。第三,当程序参与相对人人数众多时,在程序最后阶段应增加质疑和说明理由程序,一方面,可以在结果生效之前形成监督焦点,有利于发现错误,另一方面,避免了立即生效后,既有的错误被揭示所带来的政府公信力的削弱。
When we fail to attach importance to due process, we call due process, treating it as a miraculous cure for the evils of the administrative law. However, when we introduce due process, we find that it often fails and loses its name in practice. People can not help but start disappointment with the program. The reason is that certain administrative organs monopolize the procedure. The monopoly of such a program must be broken before the procedural result is just achieved. This requires in-depth institutional reengineering of the existing procedures in our country. First of all, in order for the information to be publicly available, the relevant provisions must be detailed, and the details of the legislation should be set in a hierarchical manner so as to prevent public loopholes. The expansion of the querying capabilities of interested parties, including helping a large number of interested parties to establish interim organizations, Expected results of information disclosure. Second, to give the program the right to participate in the relative independent decision-making, to ensure that the program to participate in the relative person to complete one or more program segments independently, thus, get rid of the program presenter’s monopoly on the program. Thirdly, when the procedure is involved in a large number of relatives, it is necessary to increase the process of challenging and explaining the reasons at the final stage of the procedure. On the one hand, the focus of supervision can be formed prior to the effective date of the result, which is conducive to finding mistakes; on the other hand, , The existing mistakes have been revealed to weaken the credibility of the government.