论文部分内容阅读
自有人类历史以来,诗性生活一直伴随着历史进程而发生和存在。史上以宏大叙事结构出现的史诗篇章,似乎说明和证实了——人类共同创作的历史事实和诗意真相,于是才有“每一首诗都有一个荷马式的问题”之说。回到眼下,暂且抛开现代诗之“互文性”写作的合法性不谈,在愈发逼仄的后现代诗意空间,我们一贯认可和尊崇的“个人化写作”是否真的存在?那么,基于诗歌的原创性,诗人又是以怎样的
Since human history, poetic life has always accompanied and existed along with the historical process. The epic chapters in history that appeared in the grand narrative structure seem to illustrate and confirm the historical fact and the poetic truth of the co-creation of mankind. Therefore, “there is a Homer-style problem in every poem”. Back to the moment, aside from the legitimacy of writing “Intertextuality” in modern poetry, in the increasingly cramped postmodern poetic space, we have always recognized and respected the “personal writing” is really Existence? Then, based on the originality of poetry, what is the poet?