论文部分内容阅读
我曾在浙江教育学院主办的《政治课教学》1993年第1期发表了《货币≠金银》一文,对广义货币、狭义货币以及货币的起源、发展、现实等问题进行了探讨。最近,我看到贵刊1993年第8期刊登的黄秀安、时盛荣《广义货币与狭义货币》一文(以下简称“黄文”),觉得该文不顾我文的基本事实,并出现多起错误,特与之商榷。 一、“黄文”说:“石文把贝壳、金银都称之为货币是正确的,但是他同时又忽视了另一方面:货币还有狭义的一方面。”“黄文”这种不顾及我文的基本事实的做法是不可取的。这里不妨将我那篇文章简述一段:“马克思在《资本论》第1章中只
I published the article “Currency, Gold, and Silver” in the “Politics Class Teaching” sponsored by the Zhejiang Institute of Education in 1993 and discussed issues such as the origin, development, and reality of broad money, narrow money, and currency. Recently, I have read Huang Xi’an and Shi Shengrong’s “Broad and Thin Currency” article (hereinafter referred to as “Huang Wen”) published in the 8th issue of your magazine in 1993. I feel that the article disregards the basic facts of my writing and that there are many Wrong, especially discussed. First, “Huang Wen” said: “Shi Wen’s right to call shells, gold and silver is correct, but he also ignores the other side: money also has a narrow sense.” “Huang Wen” It is not advisable to disregard the basic facts of my article. Here’s a brief paragraph from my article: "Marx had only the first chapter of Capital.