论文部分内容阅读
为应对美国可能的反倾销指控,中国菱镁矿企业通过行业协会协调出口最低价格。美国相关企业在美国法院起诉中国企业价格串通违反美国反托拉斯法。美国联邦第三上诉法院撤销了地方法院的判决,将其发回重审,认为《外贸反托拉斯促进法》并不限制联邦法院的管辖权。美国法院有关管辖问题的观点将对中国企业在美国的反托拉斯抗辩带来一定困难,今后中国企业在应诉的初始阶段将承担较重的举证责任。
In response to possible U.S. anti-dumping allegations, Chinese magnesite enterprises coordinated the lowest export prices through industry associations. Relevant US companies prosecute U.S. companies for collusion in U.S. courts in violation of US antitrust law. The U.S. Federal Court of Appeals for Third Appeals dismissed the decision of the District Court and sent it back to the Retrial, saying that the Foreign Trade Promotion of Antitrust Law does not limit the jurisdiction of federal courts. The view of the U.S. courts on jurisdictions will bring some difficulties to Chinese antitrust protests in the United States. In the future, Chinese enterprises will bear the heavier burden of proof in the initial stage of responding to the litigation.