论文部分内容阅读
读了夏衍同志谈报纸副刊的文章(见本刊第四期)获益非浅;同时,也引起了自己对副刊工作的一些感想。虽然做副刊编辑也有几年了,但是说来惭愧,对什么是副刊,在观念上却并不很明确。这样,工作中问题就来了。第一,往往混淆了正刊与副刊的界限,把副刊也搞得和正刊差不多,或者弄得既不像正刊,又不像副刊,不能突出副刊的特点,发挥其应有的作用;第二,不明确正刊与副刊的主从关系,有时把副刊的特殊性强调到不适当的地步,和正刊脱节;这也难以发挥副刊的战斗性。
Reading Comrade Xia Yan’s article on newspaper supplements (see Issue 4) benefited a lot; at the same time, he also aroused his thoughts on the supplement work. Although I have been a companion editor for several years, I am ashamed to say that it is not very clear in terms of concept about supplements. In this way, the problem at work is coming. First, it often confuses the boundaries between the positive and the supplements. It also makes the supplements almost equal to the positive ones, or makes them neither the positive nor the supplemental ones. It can not give prominence to the features of the supplements and play its due role. Second, it is not clear that there is a relationship between the principal and subordinate of the official journal and that of the supplement. Sometimes, the particularity of the supplement is emphasized to an inappropriate extent and the journal is out of context; it is also difficult to exert its combat effectiveness.