论文部分内容阅读
这是一个公关攻势为原告在针对一个强大的对手的法律诉讼(David-and-Goliath)中,赢得了有利于自身的结果的典型案例。这个案件中穿插了很多条线索:债权人的责任,根据这一概念的法律含义,借债人可以因不公平待遇而合法起诉债权人;得克萨斯州以及那里昙花一现的繁荣经济;豪华酒店数目的急剧膨胀;美国梦中成功的企业家等。这是一起涉及70亿美元的诉讼,由得克萨斯州的一位酒店经理帕特里克·J·肯尼迪(Patrick J.Kennedy)控告美国大都会人寿保险公司。 1968年,圣安东尼奥市正在全力以赴准备即将在这里举办的世界博览会。当时.肯尼迪正在医院里等待他的第8个孩子的降生。从
This is a PR offensive for the plaintiff in the case of a powerful opponent in the lawsuit (David-and-Goliath), winning the typical case of its own results. There are many lines interspersed in this case: the obligee’s liability, according to which the legal meaning of the concept is that borrowers can lawfully sue creditors for unfair treatment; the thriving economy of the blip in Texas and the United States; the dramatic expansion of the number of luxury hotels; the United States Successful entrepreneurs in dreams. This is a $ 7 billion lawsuit involving a U.S. Metropolitan Life Insurance company sued by Patrick J. Kennedy, a Texas hotel manager. In 1968, San Antonio was making every effort to prepare for the upcoming World Exposition here. At the time, Kennedy was in the hospital waiting for the birth of his eighth child. From