论文部分内容阅读
程序法理学关注的核心问题是,各项制度是否都拥有特定的权能领域,特定的任务能否被分配给某一制度而无需考虑其所包含的实质政策,某一制度所具有的特殊权能与怎样的特定程序相适应。在程序法理学的思想脉络之中,这一问题牵涉到司法与理性、司法与意志等论题,并经由“司法权能”这一特定概念表达出来,且具体化为“理性阐释”这样的程序性约束,从而勾勒出程序法理学的独特司法图景。在这种司法图景下,法官必须尊重其他制度的权能并且在“法治”的框架下来说明他们的决定;更重要的是,规范法官裁决的关键就在于如何确立与确立什么样的程序性权能,而非只依赖于实质性追责规定。
The core issue of procedural jurisprudence is whether all systems have specific competence areas and whether specific tasks can be assigned to a certain system without considering the substantive policies they contain, the special powers of a system What kind of specific procedures to adapt. In procedural jurisprudence, this issue involves such topics as justice and reason, judicature and will, and is expressed through the specific concept of “judicial power” and is embodied in “rational interpretation” This procedural constraint outlines the unique judicial landscape of procedural jurisprudence. Under this judicial picture, judges must respect the power of other systems and explain their decisions under the framework of “rule of law.” More importantly, the key to regulating a judge’s decision lies in the procedural aspects of how to establish and establish it Power, not just relying on substantive accountability.