论文部分内容阅读
科学史对于学生理解科学的发展及增加学习相应知识的兴趣有较大的帮助,但国内教材在此部分的编写上有较多不足。以“牛顿第一定律”为例,对比国内七种不同版本的科学教科书,发现该节编写普遍存在弱化科学史内容,科学史的发展也未体现出的问题。科学教科书的编写应展现出科学理论的发展过程,科学史内容应与科学知识更好融合,重视科学史内容的基本客观性,有效区分结论的异同。
The history of science is of great help to students in understanding the development of science and increasing their interest in learning the corresponding knowledge. However, the domestic teaching materials have more deficiencies in the preparation of this part. Taking “Newton’s First Law ” as an example, we compare seven different versions of science textbooks in our country and find that there is a problem that the ubiquitous content of the history of science is weakened and the development of the history of science is not reflected in this chapter. The preparation of science textbooks should show the development of scientific theories. The contents of the history of science should be better integrated with scientific knowledge, attach importance to the basic objectivity of the contents of the history of science, and effectively distinguish the similarities and differences of conclusions.