论文部分内容阅读
感性选择理论自提出至今,取得了一定的研究成果,但是仍然面临着挑战。这种挑战首先来自于传统社会科学研究中的逻各斯中心主义,以及人们在主体间的行动理解、认定以及自我回溯时出现偏差的可能性。同时,被社会不断建构和强化的理性观念,以及人们将功利主义简单等同于理性的认知,都会压缩感性选择的解释空间。对此,感性选择理论需要在方法上跳出主流实证主义的限制,借鉴诠释学的研究取向;在理论上与现有的理性选择理论之外的理论展开交流和对话,扩展基于感性的中观和宏观概念。
Since its introduction, perceptual choice theory has made some achievements, but it still faces challenges. The challenge first came from the logocentrism of traditional social science research and the possibility of deviations in understanding, assertion, and self-backtracking of people. At the same time, the rational concept constantly constructed and strengthened by society, and people’s simple utilitarianism equating with rational cognition, will reduce the space for interpretation of perceptual choices. In this regard, the theory of perceptual selection needs to jump out of the limits of the mainstream positivism and draw lessons from the research orientation of hermeneutics. In theory, it exchanges and talks with theories other than the theory of rational choice, Macro concept.