论文部分内容阅读
这是个老问题了。但由于辛德勇先生近年提出了新解,加之中华书局新刊的《史记》修订本接受了他的解释,修改了旧版有关文句的标点,使得这个老问题再度浮现出来。对此问题,我久有关注,但因循未有所作,现在看来,还是值得再作一番清理的。问题源自《史记,秦始皇本纪》中的一段:三十三年,发诸尝逋亡人、赘婿、贾人略取陆梁地,为桂林、象郡,南海,以适遣戍。西北逐匈奴。自榆中并河以束,属之阴山,以为(三)[四]十四县,城河上为塞。又使蒙恬渡河取高
This is an old question. However, since Mr. Xin Deyong put forward a new solution in recent years and the revised edition of “Historical Records”, a new issue of the Zhonghua Book Company, accepted his explanation, he revised the punctuation of the old version of the relevant sentence so that the old problem could emerge again. I have long been concerned about this issue, but I have not done anything about it. Now it is worth further cleaning up. The problem stems from the “Shi Ji, Qin Shi Huang Ji” in a period: thirty-three years, sent all the taste of death, sons-in-law, Jia Ren slightly take the land for Guilin, as the county, the South China Sea, to allow garrison. Northwest by the Huns. Since Yuzhong and the river to beam, is a Yinshan, that (c) [four] fourteen counties, the river is plug. Also make Mengtian crossing the river to take high