论文部分内容阅读
目的:探索小儿支气管哮喘采用不同雾化吸入方式治疗效果比较。方法:选取100例支气管哮喘患儿,随机平均分成观察组和对照组。观察组患者进行氧驱动雾化吸入治疗,对照组患者进行超声雾化吸入治疗。观察两组患者治疗后肺功能、临床症状消失时间和血氧饱和度。结果:对照组的患儿的哮鸣音(t=-4.222,P<0.05)、咳嗽(t=-5.258,P<0.05)和气喘(t=-2.417,P=0.018)等临床症状的消失时间都明显高于观察组;观察组的患儿治疗前的血氧饱和度显然低于治疗后的血氧饱和度(t=-1.507,P=0.135);而对照组的患儿治疗前的血氧饱和度显著高于治疗后(t=35.113,P<0.05)。结论:氧驱动雾化吸入的方式更适合运用于小儿哮喘的治疗。
Objective: To explore the therapeutic effect of bronchial asthma treated by different inhalation methods. Methods: 100 children with bronchial asthma were randomly divided into observation group and control group randomly. Patients in the observation group were treated with inhalation of oxygen driven atomization and patients in the control group were treated with ultrasonic atomization inhalation. After treatment, lung function, disappearance of clinical symptoms and oxygen saturation were observed. RESULTS: The symptoms of wheezing (t = -4.222, P <0.05), cough (t = -5.258, P <0.05) and asthma (t = -2.417, P = 0.018) Time was significantly higher than the observation group; observation group children before treatment was significantly lower than the oxygen saturation after treatment oxygen saturation (t = -1.507, P = 0.135); while the control group of children before treatment Oxygen saturation was significantly higher after treatment (t = 35.113, P <0.05). Conclusion: Oxygen-driven nebulization is more suitable for pediatric asthma treatment.