论文部分内容阅读
“·”的消失是中世纪朝鲜语音系到19世纪近代朝鲜语音系最大的元音变化。它的消失直接影响到了元音的阴阳对立,极大破坏了元音和谐律。不过它的两个演变方向“(■)”[a]和“一”[W]究竞以什么规律进行,至今没有很好的解答。通过系统地比较16至18世纪三本《老乞大谚解》中的语料,本研究对李基文教授的两阶段变化说进行了修正,并提出“·”[(■)]变成“(■)”[a]或者“一”[w]与其自身的语音结构密切相关。如果本身的语音环境有利于保证它的开口度,它就演变成“(■)”[a],如果开口度得不到保证,它就变成“一”[W]。而且在开口度不能保证的例子中,也有部分词汇由于辅音的影响,继续由“一”[w]向“(■)”[(■)]、“(■)”[u]或者“(■)”[o]发生变化。
The disappearance of “” is the largest vowel change in the Korean language phonology from the Middle Ages to the Korean phonology in the 19th century. Its disappearance has a direct impact on the yin and yang opposition of the vowel, greatly undermining the vowel harmony law. However, its two directions of evolution, “(■) ” [a] and “a ” [W] study competition rules, so far there is no good answer. By systematically comparing the corpus in the three Old Lamentations in the 16th and 18th centuries, this study amended the two-stage change theory of Professor Li Jiewen and proposed that “” “(■) ” [a] or “a ” [w] is closely related to its own phonetic structure. If its own voice environment is conducive to ensuring its opening degree, it evolves into “(■)” “[a], which becomes” a “if the opening degree is not guaranteed. And in the case where the degree of opening can not be guaranteed, there are also some words that continue to change from consonants to ”“ (”) “ [(■)], ”(■) u] or “(■) ” [o] changes.