论文部分内容阅读
目的研究纸片法直接采样快速检测皮肤消毒效果的可行性。方法采用纸片直接贴附皮肤采样快速检测皮肤消毒效果的纸片法,同时用标准法棉拭子采样检测法作平行对照比较。结果细菌染菌方法相同,同种试验菌,同种采样检验方法,两种浓度菌悬液,高浓度的染菌回收率低于低浓度的染菌回收率;同种试验菌,同种浓度的菌悬液,两种采样检验方法,纸片法的染菌回收率高于标准法的染菌回收率,经统计学分析差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论纸片法的染菌回收率高于标准法,且纸片法直接贴附皮肤采样,操作简便,培养时间短,在皮肤消毒效果的快速检测方面具有很大潜力。
Objective To study the feasibility of direct detection of skin disinfection by paper sampling method. Methods The method of paper patch was used to directly test the disinfection effect of the skin by skin sampling. Meanwhile, the cotton swab samples were tested by the standard method for parallel control. The results of the same method of bacterial contamination, the same test bacteria, the same sampling test methods, two concentrations of bacterial suspension, high concentration of bacterial recovery was lower than the low concentration of bacterial recovery; same test bacteria, the same concentration Of the bacterial suspension, the two sampling test methods, paper method of bacterial recovery rate was higher than the standard method of bacterial recovery, the statistical analysis of the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The bacterial recovery rate of the paper method is higher than that of the standard method, and the paper method is directly attached to the skin sample for easy operation and short training time. It has great potential in the rapid detection of the skin disinfection effect.