论文部分内容阅读
新手爸爸陈先生怎么也想不到,把自己未满月的儿子的生活照片发布到MSN共享空间供亲友们欣赏,结果其中的光屁屁照片被认为包含裸露内容,导致该共享空间被封。对于MSN网站的这种做法,有人表示赞同,认为婴儿从出生起,既有家庭的属性,也有社会的属性,法律应该为保护他们的权益做出努力;但也有人说,从中国人的习惯上,宝宝,特别是婴幼儿,除了生命权利被司法机关重视以外,其它权利都应该属于父母,比如婴幼儿肖像权、名誉权,以及能否以裸露的方式公开等权利。对于以上两种看法,你比较支持哪一方呢?
Novice father Mr. Chen could not think of how his son’s life photos of his month is released to the MSN shared space for friends and relatives to appreciate, the result of which the photo of the butt is considered to contain nudity, resulting in the shared space is blocked. For the MSN website, some people agree that the baby from birth, both family and social attributes, the law should make efforts to protect their rights and interests; but some people say that from the Chinese people’s habits On the other hand, babies, especially infants and young children, should have their rights attached to their parents, such as the right of portraiture of infants and young children, the right of reputation, and the possibility of public disclosure of such rights in a bare way, except that the right to life is taken seriously by the judiciary. For the above two views, which one do you support more?