论文部分内容阅读
“巴黎原则”要求国家人权机构必须依各国宪法或法律设立。据此,各国可以结合自身的历史发展需要,选择适合本国国情的国内立法方式。从部分国家的实践来看,有的国家在宪法中用专门章节,以宣誓性的语言提出建立国家人权机构,随之以一般法律或行政规章的方式全面、详细设定机构的具体职权;有的国家则通过一般法律,设立国家人权机构。在借鉴其他国家经验的基础上,中国必须加紧考虑设立类似机构的国内法的依据。
The Paris Principles require that national human rights institutions be established in accordance with the constitutions or laws of all countries. Accordingly, all countries can, in light of their historical development needs, choose the domestic legislative method that suits their national conditions. From the practice of some countries, some countries in the constitution devote sections of the Constitution to declaring the establishment of a national human rights institution in an oath of discourse, followed by a general and detailed setting of the specific authority of the institution in the form of general laws or administrative rules. There are Of the countries adopted the general law to establish national human rights institutions. Drawing on the experience of other countries, China must step up its consideration of the basis for establishing a national law for similar institutions.