论文部分内容阅读
本文主要围绕麦克塔加和分析哲学学派的时间理论之争展开讨论。第一节考察了麦克塔加“时间悖论”的论证过程。首先,他区分了A系列(过去、现在、将来)和B系列(在先、在后),并指出B系列无法说明时间的本质,能够说明时间本质的只有A系列;其次,他论证了A系列不可能具有实在性,因此,时间和变化都是非实在的。在第二和第三节中,详细分析了A-理论家和B-理论家反驳“时间悖论”的诸种理由。得出的结论是:A-理论家和B-理论家都接受了麦克塔加对时间所进行的二分法处理,因而无法最终解决问题,反而产生了新的争论(A-理论与B-理论之争)。职是之故,我们初步引入了以现象学方案解决“时间悖论”的构想。
This paper mainly discusses the dispute between time theory of Matagagan and Analytic Philosophy School. The first section examines the process of argumentation of McTaga “Time Paradox ”. First, he distinguished between Series A (Past, Present, Future) and Series B (Prior and Later), noting that series B failed to explain the nature of time and that there was only series A that characterizes the nature of time. Second, he argued that A Series can not be real, so time and change are non-real. In Chapters II and III, the various reasons why A-theorists and B-theorists refute the “paradox of time” are analyzed in detail. Came to the conclusion that both A-theorist and B-theorist accepted the dichotomy of time spent by McTaga, and thus could not finally solve the problem, but created a new controversy (A-theory and B-theory The dispute). As a result, we initially introduced the concept of phenomenology to solve the paradox of time.