从乾嘉到晚清以迄民初近二百年间,碑学一直占据书史主流,帖学则叨陪末座,成为书史边缘化的存在。对书史而言,这构成一个巨大的反讽,而由官僚文人集团领导发起的一个旨在颠覆文人书法价值系统的书法民间化运动与思潮,则对文人书法而言,更是意味着一种前所未见的自我揶揄与批判。由此,书法史演变为思想史、观念史,而其内在理路竟是围绕笔法展开的。也正是从清代碑学开始,由帖学道统建构起的完整意义的书法史被撕 From Qianjia to the late Qing Dynasty nearly two hundred years since the early years of the Republic of China, Beilu has occupied the mainstream of Book History, but has remained the marginalized history of Book History. For the history of books, this constitutes a huge irony, and the bureaucratic scholar group led by a group aimed at subverting the literati calligraphy value system of civilized movement and thought of calligraphy, the literati calligraphy, but also means a Unprecedented self-esteem and criticism. As a result, the history of calligraphy evolved into the history of ideas, the history of ideas, and its inner logic was actually developed around the brushwork. It is also from the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, the history of calligraphy and Taoism built from the full meaning of calligraphy history was torn