论文部分内容阅读
在国际知识溢出效应的研究中,Falvey、Foster与Greenway认为在接受国属于公共品的知识比属于私人品的知识具有更大的知识溢出效应,但李小平和朱钟棣的研究结论正好相反。本文认为,中国非加工贸易比加工贸易具有更大更显著的国际知识溢出效应,知识在接受国是具有公共品的性质还是具有私人品的性质并不重要,重要的是贸易方式与企业接受知识的能力;中国今后应提高一般贸易的比重,加快加工贸易的转型升级,扭转贸易条件恶化的趋势,以便更有效地发挥对外贸易促进经济增长的作用。
In the study of the international spillover effect, Falvey, Foster and Greenway think that knowledge in the recipient countries is more spillover than that in the private domain, but the conclusions of Li Xiaoping and Zhu Zhongdi are the opposite. This paper argues that the non-processing trade in China has a larger and more significant effect of international spillover than that of processing trade. It does not matter whether knowledge is of a public or private nature in the receiving country. What matters is the trade method and the acceptance of knowledge In the future, China should increase the proportion of general trade, speed up the transformation and upgrading of processing trade and reverse the deterioration of trade conditions in order to give more effective play to the role of foreign trade in promoting economic growth.