论文部分内容阅读
目的比较高频热疗、药物、高频热疗结合药物治疗三种方式治疗慢性前列腺炎的疗效。方法抽取我院1112例就诊的慢性前列腺炎患者,并随机分为单纯热疗组、药物治疗组和热疗+药物治疗组三组,统计并对有效率及治愈率进行比较。结果根据统计学分析得出,单纯热疗组患者的临床治愈率明显优于药物治疗组患者,热疗+药物组患者的治愈率明显优于单纯热疗组,P<0.05,有统计学意义。结论治疗慢性前列腺炎患者,应用热疗+药物联合治疗的方法,治愈率和有效率明显提高。
Objective To compare the efficacy of high-frequency hyperthermia, drugs, high-frequency hyperthermia and drug therapy in the treatment of chronic prostatitis. Methods A total of 1112 chronic prostatitis patients treated in our hospital were selected and randomly divided into three groups: simple hyperthermia group, drug therapy group and hyperthermia + drug therapy group. Statistics and comparison of effective rate and cure rate were made. Results According to the statistical analysis, the clinical cure rate of patients in hyperthermic group was significantly better than that of drug-treated group, and the cure rate of hyperthermia + drug group was significantly better than that of hyperthermia group, P <0.05, with statistical significance . Conclusion The treatment of chronic prostatitis patients, the application of hyperthermia + drug combination therapy, the cure rate and effective rate increased significantly.