“全球化”特别是“经济全球化”一词 ,自 2 0世纪 80年代见诸西方报刊以来 ,很快成为新闻媒体和国际学术论坛的热门话题。但在欧美学术界 ,对于全球化的含义、全球化与当代资本主义的关系、全球化对世界特别是发展中国家和不发达国家的影响、全球化发展的前景等一系列问题 ,历来众说纷纭 ,争论不断。针对鼓吹经济全球化必然要求“非民族国家化”、“非领土化”、“非政府治理”、“非主权化”和“跨国民主化”等论调 ,不少西方学者据理驳斥 ,对当代资本主义的现状及其所主导的全球化实质作了批判性的论述 The term “globalization”, and especially “economic globalization,” has been a hot topic in the news media and international academic forums since its arrival in the Western press in the 1980s. However, scholars in Europe and the United States have always been divided on a series of issues concerning the meaning of globalization, the relationship between globalization and contemporary capitalism, the impact of globalization on the world, especially developing countries and the underdeveloped countries, and the prospect of globalization. Arguments continue. To advocate that economic globalization inevitably calls for arguments such as “non-nationalization,” “non-nationalizatonization,” “non-governmental governance,” “non-sovereignty,” and “transnational democratization,” many western scholars have argued that they should refute the current The status quo of capitalism and the essence of globalization led by it are critically discussed