论文部分内容阅读
“主管”一词带有严重的行政化倾向。“民事诉讼主管”这一概念的性质,即积极性和主动性,与司法的消极性和被动性不相符,也在一定程度上限制了当事人的诉权,用“民事审判权范围”取代“民事诉讼主管”这一概念更为科学合理。在确定民事审判权的范围时应遵循法治原则、私权保障原则和司法最终解决原则,确定民事审判权的具体范围时应采用概括式与排除式相结合的立法方法。出现新类型、具有民事性质、当事人无法寻求其他救济方式或寻求未果的纠纷时,均可依照司法最终解决原则寻求司法救济。
The term “supervisor” has a serious tendency to be politicized. The nature of the concept of “director of civil litigation”, ie, the enthusiasm and initiative, is inconsistent with the negativity and passivity of the judiciary and to a certain extent limits the right of litigation of the litigants, with “the scope of civil jurisdiction” It is more scientific and reasonable to replace the concept of “director of civil litigation”. In determining the scope of civil jurisdiction, we should follow the principle of rule of law, the principle of private rights protection and the principle of the final resolution of the judiciary. When determining the specific scope of civil jurisdiction, the general and exclusionary legislative methods should be adopted. When new types emerge, are of a civil nature, and the parties are unable to seek other remedies or seek unresolved disputes, they may seek judicial remedies in accordance with the principle of the ultimate solution of the judiciary.