论文部分内容阅读
目的：对比和分析Gasbin法与HELPERR法这两种助产方法在肩难产应用中所发挥的作用。方法：选择我院产科收治的22例肩难产产妇进行回顾性分析，分别采用Gasbin法与HELPERR法进行助产，比较应用效果。结果：A组产妇娩肩所用时间以及新生儿Apgar评分为（7.7±1.1）分均低于B组，但并发症发生率的比较无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论：Gasbin法组产妇娩肩所用时间以及新生儿Apgar评分均低于HELPERR法组，但并发症的发生率之间没有明显差异，提示HELPERR法的应用更加谨慎，虽然免肩所用时间稍长，但是可以更好的保护胎儿，让胎儿在不受到损伤的情况下娩出。“,”ObjectiveTo comparison and analysis of Gasbin method and HELPERR method in shoulder dystocia played the role of the application of two kinds of midwifery.Methods 22 cases of shoulder dystocia primipara admitted in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed, using the Gasbin method of midwifery and HELPERR respectively, a comparison of application effect.Results In a group, the time of maternal childbirth shoulder and neonatal Apgar score was (7.7 ± 1.1) were lower than those of B group, but the complication rate showed no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Conclusion Gasbin method group maternal childbirth shoulder with time and neonatal Apgar score were lower than that in HELPERR group, but no significant difference between the incidence of complications, suggesting the application method of HELPERR more cautious, although no shoulder for a long time, the protection of fetus but could be better, so that the fetus in the case were not damage.