论文部分内容阅读
目的比较宫腔镜下电切术与刮宫术治疗子宫内膜息肉不孕症的疗效。方法 48例子宫内膜息肉不孕症患者,根据随机数字法分为对照组(刮宫术)和观察组(宫腔镜下电切术),每组各24例,随访1年,比较两组患者月经量、并发症、妊娠率。结果与对照组相比,观察组治疗后月经量明显减少,妊娠率明显增高(P<0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论宫腔镜下电切术治疗子宫内膜息肉不孕症的疗效可靠,安全性高,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare the efficacy of hysteroscopic resection and curettage in the treatment of endometrial polyps infertility. Methods 48 cases of endometrial polyps infertility patients were divided into control group (curettage) and observation group (hysteroscopic resection) by random number method, 24 cases in each group, followed up for 1 year, compared the two groups Menstruation patients, complications, pregnancy rate. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group after treatment significantly reduced menstrual flow, pregnancy rate was significantly higher (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion Hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps infertility is reliable, safe and worthy of clinical promotion.