论文部分内容阅读
【目的】研究科技论文中文字复制比较低但仍然存在学术不端的现象,以提高论文审稿质量。【方法】文献资料法,个案研究法以及综合分析法。【结果】学术不端文献检测系统的检测结果多以文字的复制比来表示,但文字复制比的高低并不能代表作者是否有学术不端行为,有的文章虽然文字复制比较低,但仍然存在不端行为。【结论】编辑不仅要检测文章的文字复制比,而且要切实履行编辑职责,运用不同方法审查稿件的隐性重复现象,提高编辑初审质量。
[Objective] To study the phenomenon that there is still some academic misconduct in Chinese texts in scientific papers, so as to improve the quality of manuscript review. 【Method】 Documentation, Case Study and Comprehensive Analysis. [Results] Most of the detection results of academic misconduct literature detection system are represented by copy ratio of texts. However, the ratio of textual reproduction does not mean that the author has academic misconduct. Although some articles have relatively low textual reproduction, they still exist Misconduct. [Conclusion] The editor should not only test the copy ratio of the article, but also fulfill the editor ’s duty effectively, use different methods to examine the implicit repetition of the manuscript, and improve the quality of the first instance of the editor.