知识青年上山下乡的(?)面积展开并形成一种运动,是在1968年.毛泽东同志点明了知识青年上山下乡运动的目的,是接受很有必要的“贫下中农的再教育”.贫下中农是否教育了知识青年,以及教育和接受教育的程度如何,我们不在这里进行探讨.本文旨在从文化的角度研究知识青年上山下乡运动对农村的影响.笔者认为:在文化上,是知识青年改造了农村.这种改造是知识青年对农村的非主观改造,是无意识的对农村的改造.这种改造的实质,是代表进步文化的都市文化,对相对落后的乡村文化的改造.知识青年从城市来到乡村,大数量地集中地且长期地作为一个文化群体生活在农村,这在我国历史上不曾有过.人本身就是文化的载体,知识青年以其自身的知识、存在和行为方式表现着都市文化,影响和改造着农村.知识青年上山下乡的十几年间,社会的传播媒介还仅局限于有线广播和报刊书籍.农村人对都市文化的了解和接触,仅限于个别人偶尔走马观花后的描绘和传媒的间接介绍.这些,远不及都市里来的文化群体更能直接表现都市文化.在农村,接受都市文化较早的是生长在乡村的青年人,尤其是乡村中的文化青年.一方面是青年人少保守,愿意并易于接受来自于“城市”的东西;另一方面,青年人与青年人的较多的接触机遇,也造成了他们首先接纳进步文化的良好 The (?) Area of ​​knowledgeable youth who went to the countryside for work started and formed a movement in 1968. Comrade Mao Tse-tung made it clear that the purpose of the movement of knowledgeable youth to go to the countryside was to accept the necessary “re-education of poor and poor middle peasants.” The next step is whether the middle peasants have educated young people and the level of education and education is not discussed here.The purpose of this paper is to study the impact of the youth movement of intellectual youth on rural areas from a cultural perspective.The author believes that in terms of culture, The transformation of rural areas by young people is a non-subjective transformation of knowledge-based youth in the countryside and an unconscious transformation of rural areas, the essence of which is the urban culture that represents a progressive culture and the transformation of a relatively backward rural culture. Youth came to the villages from the cities and lived in rural areas in a concentrated and long-term as a cultural group, which has never been seen in our history. People themselves are carriers of culture, and knowledge-based youth, with its own knowledge, existence and behavior Way performance of urban culture, influence and transform the rural areas .In the past ten years of knowledge youth going to the countryside, the media in society is still limited to wired Sowing newspapers and periodicals, etc. The rural people’s understanding and contact with the urban culture is limited to the occasional introduction by the individual after a cursory look and the indirect media introduction, which are far less capable of presenting the urban culture directly than the cultural groups in the cities. In rural areas, urban culture was accepted earlier by young people who grew up in rural areas, especially young people in rural areas. On the one hand, young people were less conservative, willing and receptive to things from the “city”; on the other hand, young people More opportunities for contact with young people have also led to their first acceptance of a progressive culture