关于语言与思维关系的讨论由来已久。以柏拉图为代表的“等同论”者认为,思维和语言是同一事物,语言是出声的思维,思维是无声的语言。后来,更多的人认为语言和思维是两种不同的东西,但有密切的联系。以美国语言学家萨皮尔和沃尔夫为代表的“语言决定论”者认为,学习一种语言无非是学会用该种语言来思维。以苏联心理学家卢利亚为代表的“思维依赖语言论”者认为,语言和思维有密切关系,人类的思想依赖于语言,离开了语言,逻辑思维是 The discussion on the relationship between language and thinking has been taking a long time. The “equivalence” represented by Plato holds that thinking and language are the same thing, that language is a sounding voice and thinking is a silent language. Later, more people think that language and thinking are two different things, but are closely linked. The “linguistic determinism” represented by the American linguists Sapir and Wolfe argues that learning a language is nothing more than learning to think in that language. For example, the theory of “language dependent on thinking”, which is represented by the Soviet psychologist Lu Liya, holds that language and thinking are closely related to each other, that human beings rely on language and leave the language and that logical thinking