论文部分内容阅读
一位近几年频有成效和影响的电影理论工作者在一篇文章中触及了(注意:不是批评!)某位电影界“权威人士”,这位“权威”大为不悦:“才搞了几年电影,就这么狂妄自大,目中无人!”这话如果要我来答,我就说:“不要看搞几年,关键看懂多少! ”西方影界历来有“资深导演”、“资深演员”之讲,不知朝鲜的“功勋演员”可与此类同?我国电影界没有称号与之相匹,但在论资排辈上大体也有个标准,这就是看其“著名”与否、干了多少年,这二者大概是成正比的。如“著名导演”、“著名演员”、“著名电影评论家”等等,就是对一些资历深厚成就卓著的电
An influential film theorist in recent years touches (note: not criticism!) In an essay about a movie’s “authority” who is greatly displeased: “Only Engage in a few years of film, so arrogant, in the eyes of no one! ”If you want me to answer these words, I said:“ Do not look for a few years, the key to understand how much! ”Western film industry has always been“ senior director ” “Senior performers,” I do not know North Korea’s “Merit actor” can be the same? My film industry does not have the title with the match, but there are generally seniority criteria, which is to see its “famous” or not, dry How many years, these two is probably proportional. Such as “famous director”, “famous actor”, “famous movie critic” and so on, is for some of the profound achievement of outstanding qualifications