论文部分内容阅读
近年来,由于地方志工作机构参照《公务员法》管理,因此有人主张地方志工作重行政管理事务轻编辑专业技术工作,乃至主张将编辑工作完全交给出版社,对于此观点,笔者认为地方志工作与出版编辑工作有密不可分的关系,甚至是一个整体,是地方志编纂工作的延伸;目前不宜急于将出版编辑工作从地方志工作机构的专业人员职责中剥离出来,尤其是省级志书的编修,剥离编辑工作是不可能的;首轮修志耗时太长是客观现实(地方志工作机构的业务人员参与出版编辑工作仅仅是原因之一,但不是唯一原因),是第二轮修志值得重视和着手解决的现实问题。修志机构专业人员和出版社专业编辑工作各有侧重,不可或缺,修志工作急需二者兼备的专业人才,应强化修志工作中的编辑工作而不是削弱和剥离。
In recent years, due to the management of local civil service agencies in light of the Civil Service Law, some people advocate reorganization of professional and technical work in the field of local history administration, and even advocate that the editorial work be completely handed over to publishers. For this perspective, I think that local history work and publication Editing work is inextricably linked, and even a whole, is an extension of the work of local history compilation; at present it is not appropriate to peel off the publishing editorial work from the professional duties of local chronicles institutions, especially the compilation of provincial-level volunteers, Editing work is impossible; the first round of repair is too long time-consuming is an objective reality (local history agencies involved in publishing business editorial work is only one of the reasons, but not the only reason) is the second round of repair is worth attention and to address Realistic problems. Professionals specializing in Chi institutions and editors specializing in publishing houses have their own emphasis and indispensability. They urgently need the professionals who have both of them to work for them. They should intensify the editorial work in the period of Chi-Chi, rather than weaken and divest them.