大多数学者认为对侵犯赃物的行为人,对教唆犯、不作为犯不能进行正当防卫,本文对此提出了质疑。文中从占有的法律保护,教唆犯、不作为犯会造成紧迫的危险,而对其防卫能收到防卫的效果等方面作了论证,并根据教唆犯、不作为犯的特点,对其如何进行正当防卫进行了限制。 Most scholars think that for those who invade stolen goods, they can not justify defending abettors or serving as guilty of crimes. This article questions this question. The article from the possession of legal protection, abettor, not as a criminal will create an imminent danger, and its defense can receive defensive effects and other aspects of the demonstration, and according to abettor, not as a criminal act of how to carry out Legitimate defense has been limited.