论文部分内容阅读
目的比较卒中单元医疗管理模式与普通神经内科病房模式治疗急性出血性脑血管病的临床疗效。方法选取2014年11月~2015年4月本院收治的88例急性出血性脑血管病患者作为研究对象,将其随机分为观察组与对照组各44例,其中对照组实施普通神经内科病房模式,观察组实施卒中单元医疗管理模式,最后对两组患者进行卒中量表(NIHSS)、改良Barthel指数(BI)评估。结果治疗前两组NIHSS、BI评分无明显差异(P>0.05);治疗后观察组NIHSS、BI评分改善程度优于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论卒中单元医疗管理模式在急性出血性脑血管病治疗中有应用价值,能改善患者神经功能缺损,提高患者自理能力。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of stroke management and general neurology ward treatment of acute hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease. Methods A total of 88 patients with acute hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease admitted to our hospital from November 2014 to April 2015 were selected and randomly divided into observation group (44 cases) and control group (44 cases). The control group received general neurology ward Model, the observation group to implement the stroke unit medical management model, and finally the two groups of patients with stroke scale (NIHSS), modified Barthel index (BI) assessment. Results There was no significant difference in NIHSS and BI scores between the two groups before treatment (P> 0.05). After treatment, NIHSS and BI scores in the observation group were better than those in the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion Stroke unit medical management model has the value of application in the treatment of acute hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease, which can improve neurological deficit and improve self-care ability of patients.