历来,论及文章作法,“简练”几乎是必谈的话题,谁也不会反对提倡“简笔”。至于“繁笔”,却可以说实在是尚未引起人们足够的重视,甚至还存在着某种视“繁笔”为“繁冗”的误解。《简笔和繁笔》的作者独辟蹊径,以文章繁简的辩证关系为基点,令人信服地论述了文章繁简“不可单以文字的多寡论”。而应该“各得其宜,各尽妙处”的见解,这就使人读来有耳目一新之感。对这样一篇颇有新意的课文,我们在教学中,自当引导学生在理解“简练”有别于“寡淡”的基础上,着重领悟不忌“繁笔”忌“繁冗”的道理。作者不但有理论,而且有实践,这篇文章的第一段话,就写得“言简意赅”,成为全篇的灵魂。要教好《简笔和繁笔》,不妨先让学生精读此段,由学生通过研读,梳理层次,明乎繁简之理,抓住 Historically speaking, “concise” is almost a topic that must be discussed when it comes to essay writing. No one will oppose the promotion of “simply writing.” As for “complexity”, it can be said that the fact is that it has not attracted enough attention from people, and even there is a misunderstanding of “complexity” as “complexity”. The author of “Skeleton and Compassion” is a pioneer in his own way. Based on the dialectical relationship of the article’s simplicity, he convincingly discusses the complexity of the article “cannot be based solely on the number of words.” It should be understood as “all deserves it, every place is wonderful”, which makes people feel refreshed. For such a new and innovative text, we should guide students to understand that “conciseness” is different from “little lightness” and emphasize understanding of the principle of avoiding “complicated” and “duplicity”. The author not only has theory, but also practice. The first paragraph of this article is written “concise and concise” and becomes the soul of the whole book. If you want to teach well the “Stylistic and Compassionate”, you may wish to let the students read this paragraph carefully. The students will study it, sort out the level, understand the complexity, and grasp