论文部分内容阅读
论文遵循文献学的方法。以我们对《史》《汉》进行了详细比勘之后得到的材料为根据,对于《史》《汉》在体例、史料、文字、叙事、思想等各个方面的异同进行了分析和论述,并从史学著作内部发展的规律和社会环境对史家产生的影响两个方面出发,对于产生《史》《汉》异同的原因进行了初步探析。第一章:由于《史》《汉》比较在历史上是学者们关注比较多的课题。自二史产生以来至今,关于它们的比较研究的成果很多。本章对这些成果做了一个简单的回顾与总结,以明确本文的研究起点以及研究任务。第二章:本章是关于《史》《汉》编纂体例的比较研究。《史》是纪传体的开创之作,《汉》继承了这一体例,在细节上做了不少变更,如删去了“世家”一体,开拓了“书志”的
Papers follow the method of philology. Based on the material we obtained after comparing the details of “history” and “han”, we analyze and discuss the similarities and differences between “history” and “han” in the aspects of system, historical materials, writing, narration and thought, etc. From the two aspects of the law of the internal development of the history books and the influence of the social environment on the historians, the reasons for the similarities and differences between the “history” and the “Han” have been preliminarily analyzed. Chapter One: Since the comparison between “history” and “Han” is historically a topic that scholars pay more attention to. Since the history of the Second History so far, there have been many achievements on their comparative studies. This chapter makes a brief review and summary of these achievements so as to clarify the starting point and research task of this paper. Chapter Two: This chapter is a comparative study on the compilation of “history” and “Han”. “History” is the creation of documentary body, “Han” inherited this system, made many changes in the details, such as the deletion of “family” one, opened up the “Book of Records”