《曹刿论战》开头乡人以“肉食者谋之”为由,劝阻曹刿,推理过程为:当官的谋划战事,你不是当官的,所以,你不必谋划战事。这个推理犯了前提中不周延的概念在结论中变为周延概念的错误。曹刿反驳道:“肉食者鄙,未能远谋。”这句话暗含着下列推理过程:谋划战事要能深谋远虑,官员目光短浅不能深谋远虑,所以,目光短浅的官员不能谋划战事。作大前提的肯定判断是真实的,“谋划战事”在大前提中周延,在结论否定判断中也周延,该推理正确,揭示了事物本质联系。 The reason why “Cao Yong” started as a villager tried to discourage him by reason of “meat-eaters” reasoning process is as follows: When an officer plans a war, you are not an official, so you do not have to plan a war. This notion that the concept of perplexity in the premise became the fault of the notion of perversion in the conclusion. Cao Yong retorted: “The meat eater despised, far from conspiracy.” This sentence implies the following reasoning process: planning war can be far-sighted foresight, short-sighted officials can not foresight, therefore, short-sighted officials can not plan a war. The affirmative judgment made for the major premise is true, and the “plan of the war” has been extended in the general premise and also delayed in the conclusion negative judgment. This reasoning is correct and reveals the essential connection of things.