论文部分内容阅读
《民诉法解释》首度明确了即时通讯记录电子数据的证据地位,然而,即时通讯记录通讯主体未知性、通讯对象无形性、通讯方式瞬时性、通讯内容非稳定性等多重因素却合力引致其司法认定巉岩林立:抽象维度,主体困境、原件困境、语境困境并列,微观维度,集中呈现为司法说理机制不足、司法认定标准模糊、司法认定结果分化等复合缺陷。在此基础上,构建即时通讯记录的鉴真规则、辨识规则、原本规则等专属性司法认定规则成为破解其司法认证瓶颈的综合进路。
For the first time, Civil Code of Civil Procedure Law clarifies the evidential status of instant messaging in recording electronic data. However, multiple factors such as the inaccuracy of the subject of instant messaging, the intangibility of communication partners, the instantaneous communication mode, and the instability of communication contents, Its judgments of jade stone: abstract dimension, main dilemma, original dilemma, contextual dilemma juxtaposition, micro-dimensions, focus on the lack of judicial mechanisms, lack of judicial standards, judicial determination of the results of the composite defects. On this basis, the construction of the real-time record of the jury rules, identification rules, the rules of the original and other exclusive rules of judicial judgments become the bottleneck of judicial interpretation of the integrated approach.