论文部分内容阅读
在我国现行刑法分则条文罪状的表述中,有12条14个罪名的犯罪构成中出现了“扰乱”一词,并将其归纳到犯罪构成要件中作为是否定相关罪名的依据。由于刑法中“扰乱”一词的参照依据的复杂性及“扰乱”一词本身的笼统性,我国刑法理论和实务界对“扰乱”一词内涵和外延的理解存在很大的争议,以及我国刑法对某些“扰乱”型犯罪规定不统一、用语不当造成了司法上认定不统一,甚至使一些罪名成为了“口袋罪”。本文拟就此问题进行专题探讨,以期能引起大家对此
In our current criminal law, the article states that there are “disturbances” in the crime constitution of 12 crimes with 14 counts, which are summed up in the elements of the crime as the basis for negating the related crimes. Due to the complexity of the reference basis of “disturbing” and the generality of “disturbing” in criminal law, there is a great understanding of the connotation and denotation of “disturbing” in China’s criminal law theory and practice circles Great controversy, and the criminal law of our country are not uniform with certain “disturbances” crimes. The improper use of words leads to the judicial unification and even makes some crimes “pocket crimes.” This article intends to conduct a special discussion on this issue, with a view to arouse everyone’s concern