论文部分内容阅读
目的比较不同治疗方法对手足口病普通型临床疗效。方法采用临床实用性队列研究方法,分为中医组、中西医结合组、西医组3个不同临床治疗方法进行观察。结果在退热起效、体温恢复正常方面,中医组具有较强的优势;咽部疼痛方面,西医组有较强的优势;其余观察项目比较差异无统计学意义。结论中医治疗手足口病普通型具有较好的临床治疗优势,应成为临床主要治疗方法之一。
Objective To compare the common curative effect of different treatment methods on hand-foot-mouth disease. Methods The clinical practical cohort study method was divided into three groups: traditional Chinese medicine group, integrated traditional Chinese and western medicine group, western medicine group, three different clinical treatment methods were observed. Results In the onset of fever, body temperature returned to normal, the Chinese medicine group has a strong advantage; pharyngeal pain, Western medicine group has a strong advantage; the rest of the observation items was no significant difference. Conclusion Traditional Chinese medicine treatment of hand, foot and mouth disease common type has better clinical treatment advantages, should become one of the main clinical treatment.