论文部分内容阅读
目的比较腹腔镜筋膜内全子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术及阴式全子宫切除术的临床效果。方法选取我院2008年1月至2012年12月216例子宫切除术患者,分为三组,CISH组(实施腹腔镜下筋膜内子宫切除术)、TVH组(实施阴式全子宫切除术)、AH组(实施经腹子宫切除术),统计分析三组手术方法的各项指标。结果腹腔镜手术出血量少,镇痛药物应用较少,而且能够较快恢复,住院时间较短,可以使腹部保持美观,不存在瘢痕,但是所需费用稍多。结论腹腔镜筋膜内全子宫切除术和阴式全子宫切除术相比较经腹子宫切除术效果更佳优良,在治疗过程中,更具有推广价值。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of laparoscopic total hysterectomy and transabdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. Methods A total of 216 cases of hysterectomy patients from January 2008 to December 2012 in our hospital were divided into three groups: CISH group (laparoscopic intrafascial hysterectomy), TVH group (vaginal hysterectomy ), AH group (implementation of abdominal hysterectomy), statistical analysis of the three groups of surgical methods of the indicators. Results Laparoscopic surgery less bleeding, less analgesic drugs, and can be quickly restored, shorter hospital stay, can make the abdomen to maintain the appearance, there is no scar, but slightly more cost. Conclusion Laparoscopic total hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy better and better, in the course of treatment, more with the promotion of value.