论文部分内容阅读
曾几何时,关于定牌加工是否侵犯商标权的争议一度成为中国商标法实务界和学术界的热门话题,认为构成侵权的拿出了一大堆法律和理论依据,认为不构成侵权的也拿出了一大堆法律和理论依据,谁都说服不了谁,法院也在个案裁判中摇摆不定,没能达成普遍的共识和统一的标准。最近,浙江省高级人民法院在“Roadage”案再审判决~([1])中认定一审被告容大公司未经许可,在类似商品上使用与原告商标相同或者近似的标识,容易导致混淆,构成对原告注册商标专
Once upon a time, controversy over whether branded processing infringes on trademark rights has been a hot topic in the practice circles and academics of trademark law in China. It argues that a large number of legal and theoretical grounds for infringement have come to light and that infringement is not inflicted A great deal of legal and theoretical evidence can not convince anyone. The courts are also wavering in case decisions and fail to reach common standards of consensus and unification. Recently, the Higher People’s Court of Zhejiang Province found the first instance defendant Yung Tai Company illegally using the same or similar mark on the similar goods as the plaintiff’s trademark in the “Roadage” retrial judgment ([1]), which easily led to confusion , Constitute a registered trademark of the plaintiff